2. The "rise" of the so-called "new risks" has, however, has waken up the hitherto complacent medical world. Despite all the medical, pharmacological, technological and surgical efforts, diease is rather increasing rather than decreasing, along with an alarming number of "new diseases" and that at a younger age. There are already 30.000 "different diseases" registered. Which increasingly brings about turmoil, confusion, uncertainty and concern in all sectors of society. The conference held in December 1998 in The Hague * about the "new risks", a partnership between business, government and insurance companies, was an initial manifestation of it. Besides the direct benefit of the patient, there are major financial and economic interests at stake. Just take sick leave and soaring disability benefits. From the congress folder: "New risks are linked in particular to the advancing technology: Increasingly risks sneak in our society that we had not foreseen: DES, BSE, disorders associated with the nuclear risk, climate change, diseases such as asbestosis and mesothelioma, RSI, EMF, OPS, effects of pesticide use, (2013: electro-smog, dementia, Altzheimer, cancer). New risks can not perceived by human senses, popping up - because of this - unexpectedly, often lack a scientific basis , have a long incubation period, are large-scale, can affect anyone while seriously threatening society. And new risks are according to their nature and size are difficult to fit in in traditional insurance solutions ".

* The conference, "for unknown reasons" was canceled at the last minute ...

3. Thus, the conference brochure gives a good indication, where the shoe pinches: the traditional approach to health care fails increasingly and widely when it comes to the current health-threatening factors. Factors that not only produce "new risks", but worsen the statistics of existing common diseases such as heart disease, lung disease, diseases of the skeletal, degenerative diseases, mental disorders and cancer, for example *. How this usually works? Take ME or chronic fatigue-syndrome. Firstly, a physical inventory of the symptoms, in this case that chronic fatigue, fever, swollen glands, sore throat, muscle and joint pain, digestive disorders, dizziness, headache, sleep and concentration disorders , memory and vision loss, is made. This combination of symptoms is subsequently defined by giving it a special name: in this case "ME" as a separate entity, an isolated SPECIFIC DISEASE. As usual, the search starts for "specific" causes, "belonging" to this "specific" disease. Which of course requires "intensive research" (...). Given "the complexity of the disorder a very broad field of research is necessary" says a letter to ME patients. Subsequently, one promptly returns to the traditional model, individualizing and analytizing "this particular case". Medical history, laboratory, objectively verifying the findings with regular clinical, bio-chemical, toxicological and even orthomolecular approaches have to be tried. Moreover, there must be further investigation of hormone-like substances in the immune system (cytokines), investigation of unknown viruses, ditto in the field of endocrinology, neuro-physiology, psychology besides environmental factors. In conventional medicine, the letter continues, no effective therapy is (yet) available, as opposed to the alternative circuit, for example, where diets (temporarily) help (....).

* 40% increase in the coming decades ... despite (or because of) our increasing technological progress.

4. What is immediately striking is, that FIRST a GIGANTIC (in time, money and effort) scientific research is "interposed", before the patients can expect any effective therapy. Pleasant for all those scientists, unacceptable for the victims. It is here that a gross fallacy is made. Firstly, diseases are (almost) never mono-causal, but multi-causal. Example THE cause of ME, migraine, heart attack or cancer doesn't exist. They are always several factors COLLECTIVELY, SIMULTANEOUSLY, UNINTERRUPTED and OVER A LONGER PERIOD OF TIME interacting. The second point is that we already know those causal factors, rather than still to be sought for. It has to do with the "great risks for society as a whole" as stated in the above-mentioned conference folder. These are disease causing factors, everyone more or less exposed to. These include: Industrial agriculture and ditto food, junk food and eating habits, drinking too little, lack of exercise, our toxic environment, the amalgam syndrome, iatrogenic factors (and adverse drug reactions), electro-magnetic pollution (EMF), the digital addiction and last but not least the stress, the pressure, the overkill of impressions and "information", hazards of the workplace, the insecurities, the angst, meaninglesness and loneliness, to name but a few.

5. These disease causing factors affect EVERYONE continuously and simultaneously. It is a multifactorial etiology - a "causal swamp" -. from which no one can escape. Everyone is day and night exposed, the etiological complex has an undisputed continuous effect on body and mind. E.g. everyone has an intake of at least tens of thousands different chemical substances each day, (of which not yet 1% has been studied on harmfulness), everyone living in a permanent electro-soup of the most different types of radiation. "Everyone has stress", most have amalgam in the mouth and swallows drugs regularly. That same majority also live unhealthy with poor diet, drinking too little, an excess of stimulants and lack of exercise. This "SumTotal" of etiological factors acting in the human body through accumulation, potentiation, synergy, resonance and facilitation. The degree of effectiveness and thus harm, depends on 1. the vulnerability of the person concerned (unborn, babies, children and the elderly ), 2. the focus of the action (one has more to endure from electro-smog, the other from toxins), 3. the individual biography (the effect is primarily related to someone's past "weak spots", 4. the synergistic effect of the various influences (e.g. the "new risks" are often the result of the COMBINED effect of antibiotics, pesticides and additives in the diet, smoking, the 70.000! different chemicals in our house, electro-smog of wireless networks, the CO and benzene from our car, mercury poisoning from amalgam etc.etc.,TOGETHER, enough reason to distrust all so-called "safe" maximum dosages and toxicity limits of single substances. They are - intentionally or not - eyewash. The figures are indeed devastating: despite all "protective measures" our health deteriorates by the day.

8. It consists of as much as possible eliminate or reduce the disease causing factors, such as the replacing the amalgam by plastic fillings and cleaning up the house from electro-smog. Early diagnosis and disease history, comprehensive physical examination, humoral pathology, flow system diagnosis together, provide objective medical findings, the validity of which is in no way inferior to that of the existing regular research and diagnostics. The therapy starts with correcting the basic metabolic balance: health food, cleaning up the gut, improving blood circulation, treating deficiencies (supplements), drinking a lot, fitness and sweating, improving oxygen utilization of the cells, neutralizing foci, promoting detoxification, de-acidification and excretion, while strengthening the immune system. The supreme method is called "Chinese Guasha". Where necessary relaxation (yoga, qigong) and simple self-help psychotherapy (mindfulness) could be added. Harmful environmental and work factors should be removed. Introduction of ecological agriculture and production of healthy food, the UMTS (G3/G4) network via a cable instead of the ether, the Swedish standard for computers for example, reducing the hours of "virtual activity" for children. Doing so "diseases" such as RSI, ME, fibromyalgia, PMS, high blood pressure, migraine, tinnitis, ME, etc. etc. appear not to stand alone, but prove to be different aspects of the same syndrome: the "Multi Etiological Sumtotal Syndrome", obviously, with individual accents. It proves that the individualistic-analyzing effect approach is totally inadequate. A completely new (scientific) approach is needed, one that emphasizes the connections and interactions, as there the key lies, instead of in the detail. The goal is "a healthy mind in a healthy body in a healthy society." The groundbreaking concept of "Flow System Therapy", as developed by me, along with associated methods - optimizing basic metabolic functions - thus "automatically" improve health. Let's join forces with self and mutual help to face the greatest health challenge of all times.

ISBN 90-70525-27-5